Talk:Sean Manchester

From The Red Pill

I am having a bit of trouble with catagorizing this. Help please. Sugarbeta

Not occultists? If it needs a new category, suggest away! Nice additions by the way, thanks for the input. Greg 06:35, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

I wasn't sure he qualified, but occultists does sound quite right. Thank ya muchly! Sugarbeta

Greg or Hal, please review the recent edits to this article since travleingwriters last edit. In particular many links were removed which although not very flattering were part of the whole picture. Whitewashing an eccentric character like S. Manchester is hardly a credit. Or .. at least a reason for it...? Sugarbeta

I think the changes to the article itself are probably helpful, in that it reads a lot more objectively (eg. removal of "eccentric" as a description). But I agree, the link removal was unwarranted and is the opposite of objective...it removes opposing views. I vote that you should feel free to reinsert the links back into the article Sugabeta. Greg 03:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

There is a difference between "whitewashing" and removing libellous and false statements about Sean Manchester who is definitely NOT an occultist. Why should people who might have an axe to grind who know next to nothing about Sean Manchester be allowed to abuse this service by posting falsehood and defamation? The corrections made were in accordance with facts verified by and found in Writers and Authors Who's Who. This is surely a more reliable source.

I may be in need of some clarification as to who exactly are the "clueless individuals with chips on their shoulders".... 59.167.111.63 05:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Those who feel qualified to publish comments on the internet about someone they know nothing about based on their own prejudices, misconceptions and wild speculation from similarly ill-informed sources.

Thanks Greg, I'll tackle it when I can navigate and get back online. I'm unable to sign in for some reason.. but its MEEEE! Sugarbeta